This paper investigates the relationship between various PROMETHEE preference functions and risk attitudes in decision making. By employing a simulation-based approach, we varied preference function parameters across a range of alternatives to examine their effects on net flow and corresponding risk perceptions. The study aligns PROMETHEE outputs with theoretical models of rational, risk-neutral behaviour to compare how different settings influence decision-maker risk attitudes. Initial findings reveal that specific preference functions can significantly shape perceptions of risk, promoting either risk-averse or risk-seeking behaviours depending on the function configuration and the number of alternatives. The results contribute to an understanding of how multicriteria decision-making methods like PROMETHEE can be tailored to align with decision-makers’ risk preferences, thereby enhancing decision quality.